On 5/12/06, Anthony DiPierro <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 5/12/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/12/06, Anthony DiPierro
<wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
Sure, admins tend to listen to the arb com.
That's very different
from saying anyone has to listen to them.
Historicaly admins are the group most likely to publicaly dissagree
with arbcom (other than those on the reciving end).
That's ridiculous. Admins are the ones that enforce the arb com
decisions. If they disagree so strongly, then why would they enforce
the decisions?
Not at all. Ever hear of the term [[Loyal opposition]]? Same idea.
Even if the idea of a loyal opposition is irrelvant, there are a lot
of admins, and it doesn't take all that many to enforce Arbcom
decisions in the absence of wheel wars- heck, Arbcom alone could
account for a good deal if they absolutely had to.
~maru