On Jun 25, 2006, at 2:37 PM, Nathan wrote:
I never thought I'd say this, but I agree with
Phil Welch.
- Nathan (nathanrdotcom)
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Philip Welch wrote:
> I think we should replace "neutral point of view" (which is
> abbreviated to the misunderstood acronym NPOV) to
> "neutrality" (which, like "verifiability", is easier to
understand).
>
We already have trouble with editors who try to use neutral washed
out language rather than allowing opposing points of view to be fully
expressed.
Fred