Well, there we go: We now have to rewrite everything
in from a "creationism" POV --because external,
independently unverified polls, with unknown
demographic factors and unknown questions, have
expressed an overruling of both science consensus and
WP-local consensus.
Why is WP consensus not US general consensus? As
people become more educated and involved in NPOV-based
projects, the move toward rationality. NPOV requires
at least a rational basis for article craftsmanship,
which implies rationality in other areas.
IIRC, the typical MBTI for WPdians is quite different
from the average majority. WP by default is
represented by bookish, eristic types. PR crusades by
any particular irrational POV, regardless of its
representaion, is bound to fail, simply because
belief=irrationality, hence not NPOV.
--- James Gibbon <wikipedia(a)jamesgibbon.com> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:12:57 +0100
Timwi <timwi(a)gmx.net> wrote:
# 45% believe that God created human beings
pretty much in their
present form at one time within the last
10,000
years or so
# 37% believe that human beings have developed
over millions of
years from less advanced forms of life, but
God
guided the
process.
That's 82%, which I call "most".
I think that's 82% of the US specifically though,
no? For other Western
countries the figure will be considerably lower.
When asked by name whether they believe in or
lean more towards
the "theory of creationism" or the
"theory of
evolution", 57%
indicated creationism, 33% indicated evolution,
and 10%
responded "not sure."
Again, 57% I call "most".
Is that 57% of the 82%?
--
Dig It : a forum for Euro Beatles fans -
http://beatles.dyndns.org/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail for Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail