On 12/20/06, Anthere <Anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
This is in large part a question of philosophy. Is en.wikipedia (or
ru.wikipedia, or fr.wikipedia, or ar.wikipedia or... you get the
picture) a project in its own right or merely a section of Wikipedia,
a trans-lingual project?
The answer is, of course, "both". A compromise must be sought to
manage both the idea of a global project and the specific needs of
individual projects.
So, rather than saying the complaint is ill-advise, I
rather recommand
that we work together trying to set up a compromise which will be
acceptable by all parties. Saying "your name is not valid because I can
not read your language, so you can't edit Wikipedia" is not what I would
call a compromise.
No-one is actually saying this other than those who are maligning
en.wikipedia. This thread was started as an en.wp-bash and it has
remained that way, not looking at the issues but rather flinging dirt
at a particular project.
I am sorry, Anthere, that you are doing exactly the same.
--
Sam