No, he's quite specifically stated that his theory
is that Wikipedia
currently has a "pro-Jewish" bias, because it is run by a Jewish cabal.
True.
His edits themselves had little value, and he has
encouraged people to join Wikipedia and target certain
users based on their ethnicity, and to use anonymous
proxies to edit (which he admits to using himself).
In the discussion I saw he pointed out that the best way to avoid being
blocked was not to use anonymous proxies (although he was clearly familiar
with that too) but to create a username and stick to the rules. That this
method seems to have failed him does not, I think, reflect well on us. All
it will do is get him back to using open proxies.
Furthermore,
he has said some pretty vile things about Wikipedians, admittedly on other
boards; but if he had posted a list of Wikipedians who he thought were
"niggers", I wonder if the consensus for banning him would be stronger.
Perhaps the word "kike" doesn't have quite the same taboo quality.
The precise ethnic slur used would not make any difference to me. As far
as I know 'kike' is just as offensive as 'nigger' but I'm not a
native
English speaker.
Also, how many people here would really monitor
his edits, and actually spend the effort trying
to figure out if they were really NPOV, aside from
those he has targeted?
I hereby volunteer to watch his edits and revert and comment as
appropriate if he is unbanned and returns to editing. That's one. Jack,
you in? Anyone else?
Finally, as has been pointed out, his failure to
significantly disrupt Wikipedia was not for lack of trying.
I disagree. I don't think he had any intention of disrupting Wikipedia. He
certainly did want his own POV to be better represented, though.
Regards,
Haukur