How many users have EVER used move? Why not disable it, and make it a
sysop only function. I don't think its meaning is intuitive, the only
time I ever tried to use it was to reverse a vandal that had moved the
page, and I think I botched it.
I'd not want it disabled, if only because a botched move can be undone
relatively easily but a cut-and-paste that subsequently gets edited is a
nightmare. Not the least of the problems is that usually you don't even
know just by looking at the page and its history that an article *is* a
copy-and-paste job from another page. There is no link at all.
If we made page-move a sysop-only function we'd probably need to do
something about non-sysops improvising copy-and-pastes. I think it
*should* be available to nearly all regular logged-in editors.