On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:21:37 -0800, "Matthew Brown"
<morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
She was completely right, as far as I know, that !! was
a returned
user grooming an account for adminship. She was wrong in making the
unsupported leap beyond that - that this meant it was a banned user
grooming an account for adminship - and discounting all other
possibilities.
Exactly right. And in as much as any of us agreed with her, it was
that this did indeed look like a returning user grooming an account
for adminship.
The concern that a banned user might be doing exactly this, is a
real one.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG