2009/2/2 Sam Korn <smoddy(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I agree, that's definitely the most important
statistic. A more useful
statistic would be the age of the oldest unreviewed revision.
17.8 days
http://toolserver.org/~aka/cgi-bin/reviewcnt.cgi?lang=english&action=ou…
Ask, and you shall receive! Thank you!
So that's 10570 articles that have been waiting over a day (out of
12667 articles with out of date reviews). That's pretty bad... I would
have expected a long tail type distribution. Any ideas why there are
so many very out-of-date article compared to slightly out-of-date
ones?