Arvind Narayanan a écrit:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 03:59:05PM +0100, Anthere
wrote:
The natural state of a penis is with the skin.
Not circumsized.
The natural state of people is without clothes. Should
we post only nude photographs of people we write about?
Yes, on an article about human, it is perfectly logical to see a human
in its natural state : nude.
See
http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human
In this case, the topic of the article is the *penis*
Not *circumsision*
...an article on which there is *currently* no picture.
I think the
picture of the circumsized penis has nothing to do in that
article and should be moved to the article about circumsision (a
difficult word to spell).
I don't agree. If a significant fraction of males worldwide are
circumcised then certainly the picture is relevant to the article.
Arvind
If so, let's change the picture legend.
We put at the top of the article the natural picture of a penis, with a
legend stating "this is a penis"
Then, much more at the bottom of the article, we indicate that some
people have their penis transformed, and we put the relevant picture
with a label "circonsized penis"
Labelling the normal penis a "uncircumsized penis" is POV.