From: Ray Saintonge
Jake Nelson wrote:
>Rick wrote:
>
>>I stronly object to that information as junk. It is extremely
useful,
and
>>
>deserves to be in the Wikipedia, just as much as information about
any
other
>location in the world.
>
>Indeed, it's an extremely important base to work from. Though I
wouldn't
mind an option
for Random Page to skip it.
I suppose that such an option wouldn't hurt anything.
I do support keeping these pages, and I'm clearly not alone in that
view. Nevertheless, they are constantly mentioned by some of the
deletionists as things that should go. That alone makes us
inclusionists uncomfortable and suspicious about the other side's
motives.
I've expressed my dissatisfaction with the Rambot pages in the past and
suggested methods of dealing with such auto-added content. Just as
proponents of deletionism aren't monolithic zealots, neither are
proponents of inclusionism.