-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Ray Saintonge wrote:
Brian Haws wrote:
Martin Richards
<Martin(a)velocitymanager.com> wrote:
> Just kidding, I never get involved with AFD
at the moment as a
> >>kind of silent protest at the silly way it functions. I do think
> the idea, or >>some variant of it is great, and will go a long way
> to fixing this. However, >>I think the "Uncontested deletions"
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_reform/Proposals/Unconteste…
> is good too, some hybrid of the two ideas may be a really good
> >>solution.
I think the uncontested deletions proposal has a lot of potential as a
stand alone way to funnel off easy and obvious deletion canidates from
AFD. I'd like to hear more opinions about it on it's talk page..
It will clearly be more efficient. AFD fails because it broadcasts the
fact that an article is proposed for deletion. By confining the
deletion discussion to the page itself (and its talk page, of course) it
will limit interference by inclusionists who do not recognize the value
of removing cruft from Wikipedia.
Ray, I severely hope you're joking...
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBQ1za1LMAAH8MeUlWAQiCOgf/fhdqvMYJcbMnmTjD+Nbg0v2/5vNGUKr4
izSez9pRLEispjghgKQcPKMQSrwrRh8ACMIsEDMXvPrl5SS8CKLEmZRRle14zNLF
CnwTVgG81fyphWZqZmQqYP3bZAyXhMyzKBx+ZW3gLbYYKTTYg9PE8CyR1ThmG6un
6VEWmLk2t3R6UUYzwOAXH7/q1lF1tyF5i9Ss4LpcpFrjKWdPAmXnjyb15jrGXGjB
Kz//ZNRcLsxoRXRI3IDoCaHZsGGiwX5O4BSarDVIR5pEGGCef6EQpbmKDgvlNzRJ
6CfKWZT8Nkhkn70shJcBUCbBIDNiz/KXiC6bTmVN0DTVNPvhnrIL3w==
=jWSL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----