Geoff Burling wrote:
Jimbo has done something that I believe we can all
work with: he explained
*why* this person is non-notable in suitable detail that not only can
another person debate the reasoning, but if the nomination carries this
case could be used as a precedent & perhaps become a new guideline. (His
argument is quite similar to what SlimVirgin had written about using Usenet
as a source a few months back.)
And additionally, I should note, my presumption of non-notability could
be easily defeated by pointing to an article or two in legitimate
mainstream martial arts magazines. Or, as in the case of Sollog, a
newspaper article or two about him being eccentric would suffice.
Maybe the solution for nominations that consist of
"non-notable; Delete"
is to respond "Keep; Why?"
*nod*
"Non-notable; delete" is a pretty lame vote. :-) But so is "notable;
keep".
--Jimbo