On 2/22/06 2:26 AM, "Phil Boswell" <phil.boswell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
But don't you see that what you have written there
is the essence of what
the article **should** say? It should be expanded a bit, but you've
summarised it nicely.
A compromise was proposed that I - and a few others - could have lived with
- a protected redirect to a short paragraph on [[Internet phenomenon]] or
[[List of YTMND fads]], which simply states he was some guy who got
convicted of a minor sex crime and had his picture turned into an Internet
meme.
No, that was not good enough for the article's proponents - we had to have
his complete life story (such as it is) and picture for all to see. The
proposal was rejected.
So, now we have nothing for a year.
-FCYTravis