From: "Steve Bennett"
<stevagewp(a)gmail.com>
On 11/30/06, Daniel P. B. Smith <wikipedia2006(a)dpbsmith.com> wrote:
What I meant is that _in Wikipedia,_ uncited
material is not high-
quality material.
What do you mean by "high quality"?
Well, according to the verifiability policy, content is _not supposed
to go into Wikipedia at all_ unless it's sourced.
I'd say that content that isn't supposed to be in Wikipedia at all
can hardly be considered to be "high quality" _for Wikipedia_.
That's going to be my last reply, as it seems to me that basically
you do not agree with the verifiability policy.