In dealing with matters like this to what extent do we
protect
downstream users? Should we go ahead and include the text, and add a
warning that a downstream user republishes the material at his own risk?
I believe that there is always a risk to any publisher to publish anything.
Free speech is only skin deep. I also think that Wikipedia should allow all
media that should be public domain but for some strange copyright
strangeness isn't. Like Max Planck's speech and Mein Kampf. Or like all
those images that have become a part of the world heritage but are still
claimed copyright on. Like the pic of the WTC towers burning and the Che pic
just to take two examples out of tens of thousands. I know that that is way
to radical position for Wikipedia but that's what I feel about the issue.
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail