On 29/02/2008, Nicolas Montes <placebo.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Well, we should trust our current crats to be able to
see how strong
consensus is and review opposes accordingly. That is why they were chosen
right? Just one question though, when did the percentage for RfB become 90%
or has it always been that way? It seems that if we lowered the bar a
little, we would get more and sooner or later a lot more f these opposes
would pop up along with essays about who being a crat is "no big deal".
I think it's been 90% for as long as RFB has existed in its current
form (I don't think there was a set %age at first, of course).