I've always found the problem with Wikipedia is that it has components
which
usually work remarkably well together (wiki, open editing, no-privileged
editors, neutrality, verifiability, quality) but since it has never
defined
which of these is core and which is "the means to the end", on the
occasions
when there is a conflict between choosing one of the elements over
another
we are all at sea.
Scott
Scott,
We are not "all at sea". The point is to make useful information
available to the public. If that goal is keep in mind it is possible to
resolve most issues by discussion. Focusing on the task at hand is the
key.
Fred