On 3/1/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Katefan0 wrote:
Personally, I think it's just about right that
the policy state that
information without a source may be removed.
Part of the problem is with the permissive word "may", which is too
often read as though it were "shall".
We have to assume people can read English. Saying that an unsourced
edit MAY be removed is clearly not the same as saying it MUST be or
SHOULD be.
Sarah