On 3/31/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The two year version is more likely to know why we are
where we are
now. Admins who don't know this tend to cause interesting problems.
This can also be the case with returning admins. There are other
differences that are also likely to exist.
Could a one month editor not be a good admin? If they could, then why
do we have such prejudice against the idea?
That sounds like a great recipy for admins to vote
against adminship
requests of people they have had dissputes with
Sounds good, it would cut both ways, and they could be desysopped at
the same time :) Well, seriously, if admins are having serious
disputes with each other that they can't resolve, then are they better
admins than fresh admins without a long trail of grudges? (just food
for thought...)
2 weeks tells you nothing. Even I can avoid causeing
problems for a
couple of weeks with a bit of effort.
Cool. 2 weeks of problem-free adminning. What's the downside? :)
Steve