I use my own name on WMF sites. I was warned against
doing that not long
after I started editing back in 2004. Ten years later and as a hothead
editor having my real identity known does not seem to be a problem.
Most editors use an alias. I don't know why. What are they afraid of?
Editing wikis, if you are doing it right, is a laudable task and editors
should be proud of the fact that they are helping to share knowledge in an
altruistic manner.
Rather than ensuring privacy of editors the WMF should DEMAND that editors
make their identity known. I am sure that this may cure some of the many
problems that we are seeing on WMF projects.
Having said all that there is of course a problem in some of the dodgy
countries where speaking out gets you killed. It has happened with
journalists, bloggers, activists etc. It could (has?) happen with WMF
project editors.
Alan Liefting
On 09/04/15 00:06, Andrea Forte wrote:
The discussion here has been great. I've been keeping out of it since I
have an active research project and I don't want to seed my own ideas, but
to circle back to the original post... if anyone here would like to
contribute their experiences with privacy on Wikipedia to our project,
please consider doing an interview. This is not related to the lawsuit,
btw, we started the project before that happened.
The consent form is here:
http://drexel.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_elzNLEUeTjIphrv
Thanks,
Andrea
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:00 AM, WereSpielChequers <
werespielchequers(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There is an important difference here. The WMF
does not publicly log the
IP
addresses of visitors to the site.
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Privacy_policy#your-use-of-wm-sites> It
does however publish the IP addresses of editors who are not logged in.
I could understand the elitist claim if the WMF were more privacy
conscious
of editors than readers. But it isn't, if anything the divide is a three
way one, with unregistered editors as the ones who by default have least
privacy
Regards
Jonathan
On 5 April 2015 at 21:18, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> I propose we run a study. We will survey
random editors
I always find it curious that we had dozens or hundreds of threads on
having IPs in history: this worry is very elitist, at most few millions
people ever edited.
What about the hundreds millions users who never edited? What are
*their*
IPs being logged for? It would be rather trivial to do as the IA does:
http://blog.archive.org/2013/10/25/reader-privacy-at-the-internet-archive/
I'll start worrying about the millions when we have solved privacy
issues
for the billions.
Nemo
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: