On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Ray Saintonge wrote:
That's a
strange dodging of the question.
If you were convinced that showing the blots causes harm to potential
patients, rather than to psychologists' self-esteem, would you then support
the removal of the blots?
The fact is that I'm not convinced of that, so it's pointless to engage
in hypotheticals about what I would do if I were.
That's a more obvious dodging of the question. You're basically saying
"I'm
not going to tell you if this argument could possibly be productive", which
is fundamentally dishonest.