On Apr 3, 2006, at 11:04 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
On 4/3/06, Fastfission <fastfission(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
My biggest problem with "simple" is
that many of the articles I have
seen on there are just plain *incorrect* (i.e. one which listed
It seems to me that whereas normally between wikipedias, we can't
guarantee a one to one correspondance. Is there any reason that should
be the case for SE? Perhaps by default every En page should contain a
(red)link to its simple equivalent, and definitely vice versa. Perhaps
even stubs should be created for every single en article on simple,
saying "we don't have this version in simple english, in the meantime,
click here" or something?
Simple English has one fatal flaw: sometimes there is no way to
describe a subject without using big, confusing words. I would
shudder at any presentation of any important topic in philosophy
that's restricted to a 1,000 word vocabulary.
--
Philip L. Welch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philwelch