On 5/2/06, Cheney Shill <halliburton_shill(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
When the policy is used to remove legitimate
information that is
clearly correct, or to impede the daily work of contributors against
all common sense, it is used against its original purpose and should
be interpreted in that light. Policy is a means to an end, not an end
in itself.
I agree about the OR-verifiability relationship. What confuses me in your statement is
what you mean by "clearly correct" and "common sense". Both of these
are subject to POV (and OR) if left to judgement calls. Are you restating what meets the
verifiability policy with different words to help clarify or do you mean something
else?~~~~Pro-Lick
No, verifiability is what it all boils down to. However, we need to
remain flexible in what exactly that means. Sources which are
unreliable for some statements are perfectly fine for others, e.g., a
blog might be fine as a source about itself and its own history, but
not necessarily about the issues it covers.
Erik