jayjg wrote:
On 5/30/07, Blu Aardvark
<jeffrey.latham(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There are very few circumstances where a link
could be justified, I will
grant that. But, as I said, there are occasions where one is beneficial.
Here's another possibility. Wikipedia Review's "Articles" forum was
initially designed to discuss article content in depth, and point out
any specific problems in language, structure, sourcing, whathaveyou. It
has rarely been used for this purpose, but if and when a user did post
another in-depth evaluation, it certainly could be beneficial to point
it out on Wikipedia.
How?
Um, so the article could be improved? I'm not talking rocket science here.
Wouldn't an e-mail to a list do an equally good
job?
Indeed it would. But if a well-meaning contributor pointed it out on
Wikipedia rather than on the mailing list, what would the problem be
with that?