William Pietri wrote:
Our current plan is to raise that limit gradually as the performance
implications become clear. If the community wants us to keep some hard
limit, that's also doable.
With the utmost of respect, what you want to do here is to
hew very close to the community agreed consensus, and only
depart after a new consensus develops. Going purely on what
the iron will stand in terms of load, is a surefire way to bring
about much drama and wringing of hands, heads and what
have you. Not a desirable thing at all.
I think I can encapsulate my advice in one sentence.
"Please don't plan controversial things."
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen