From: Andre Engels
"Jimmy Wales" <jwales(a)bomis.com> schrieb:
> You're making the argument that since someday, some lonely person
> might have enough freetime to waste typing in thousands and
thousands
of entries in
the manner of a robot, we have to delete any and every
article that's too trivial today.
I think that are some missing steps in that deduction, so that the
conclusion does not follow from the premises.
I'll add the missing steps:
Either these articles are having a positive effect on Wikipedia, and
then
we should allow this hypothetical person or a bot, not
ban them. Or
these
articles are having a negative effect on Wikipedia,
and then it's good
thing to delete them.
I believe you mean to use the conditional tense ("Either these articles
would have a positive effect..."), not the present tense.
Those steps still do not connect the hypothetical thousands of
mass-imported entries to actual "trivial" entries.