-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Haukur Þorgeirsson wrote:
I don't see
why we should have to wait until the
disruption begins before blocking him. He tried to cause massive
disruption: that he (appears to have) failed was simply down to the
others' lack of response.
In a charitable interpretation he tried to recruit new editors who would
agree with his POV on a particular issue within compliance of Wikipedia
rules. I've tried that too - with much the same luck...
In my personal opinion, and assuming I have the facts right, the user in
question should be unblocked again.
I agree. If we block people from editing Wikipedia because of what they
may or may not have said somewhere other than Wikipedia, or because we
feel threatened by them, then we are... well, Godwin was right.
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDCvZr/RxM5Ph0xhMRAwfWAJ44tQr/WRFHFqmP7qYrzNja1ObupwCeMwQo
9BzzlxG6tffnw5VSZ8fh/5g=
=tLix
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----