Steve Summit wrote:
Just so. We should remember that
"notability", and our
attempts to objectify it via reference to second-party
reliable sources, are only means to an end. The end goal is:
utility to our readers. Get hung up on notability if you like,
but the encyclopedic inclusivity criterion I like to use is,
"Might someone ever look this up and expect/want/need to find
this information?
Surely WP:IINFO applies here, however? Wikipedia cannot be an all-inclusive
cornucopia of useful tidbits of information. Adding a plethora of stubs
which feature little more than co-ordinates, a region link and a map
thumbnail are effective going to make Wikipedia an online map searching
facility.