On 1/7/07, Neil Harris <neil(a)tonal.clara.co.uk> wrote:
Daniel P. B. Smith wrote:
I guess I don't understand why Wikipedians
would care about this,
apart from preening.
Am I missing something?
Will being in the top ten help us to write a better encyclopedia in
some way that being in the top 100 doesn't?
More readers => more writers to share the work, better coverage of niche
subjects.
More readers => more influence to get bigger things done.
More readers => more mindshare for the free culture movement => more
similar projects.
-- Neil
Yeah, that, but there is also nothing wrong about being proud of your
work. We're in the top 10! We rule! Isn't that a great feeling?