--- Erik Moeller <erik_moeller(a)gmx.de> wrote:
[...]
Nod. Ok. You convinced me as far as Michael is
concerned. I shut up then.
I shall return to my articles. I have a [[local food]]
decaying somewhere.
Another good
point in soft banning is that
everyone
can participate (as Tannin pointed out, I think
what
he did was proposing people to join the
reversion
team, am I right ?).
Wikipedia is not meant to be a group experience, it
is meant to be an
encyclopedia.
Interesting link there
http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is_Wikipedia_an_experiment_in_anarchy
At some point, there were more discussions about this
that just your statement though.
You included,
even if I disagree with you here.
However, my survival instinct forbid me to trust
everyone just because I am said I must trust them.
Nobody's lives are at stake here.
Quite true. Nobody's lives. Not even Mav's one
perhaps.
Regards,
Erik
Yes. Amicalement. Ant
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com