On 13 October 2010 14:45, Fred Bauder
<fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net> wrote:
Is there anything on this list:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia
which is a legitimate complaint that we can do something about?
Every word. Then, when we've gone through that list, we can fix our
articles on the physical sciences:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservapedia:Conservapedian_relativity
- d.
Not fair...
But is it clear God made the Earth? Seriously, do our articles
"Creationism", "Creation myth", "Ex nihilo" and
"Genesis creation
narrative" adequately and appropriately deal with the matter?
I'm a little skeptical about "Ex nihilo", too many big words, well not
too many or too big, but a bit obscure.
Keep your eye on the ball d., the question is the adequacy and
appropriateness of our articles and behavior. What they do is another
matter. We do not list "Consider the source" among our logical fallacies,
but perhaps we should.
Fred Bauder