--- Jimmy Wales <jwales(a)bomis.com> wrote:
Cunc, it seems like you're the strongest holdout.
Among several who have voiced opposition, me included.
I've got people in private email telling me that
it's imperative that
we institute a formal voting procedure, because consensus can't work
in a group of this size. It is claimed that any one person can block
change, even if that one person agrees that the current situation is
not very desirable.
That's interesting. The campaign for a voting procedure, repeatedly
rejected by the mailing list, is now continued via private email
directly to you? Could we have more details?
Besides: the above argument for voting is weak for two reasons: we
currently have more than a single holdout against moderation, and
furthermore we have agreed before that "consensus" is different from
"everybody has veto power".
Axel
Payment for this message:
http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Galois_connection&diff=0&am…
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com