In reality, many businesses and individuals have filtering in place to
prevent access to pages that include certain keywords. I've sometimes been
stymied when following a legitimate link when I'm on a computer that has
some form of net nanny software.
As it turns out, it seems that software isn't all that great and can
significantly affect performance. And certainly we don't know much about
what expectations they had if WMF projects accepted the "free" offer.
Risker
On 10 September 2012 16:08, Bob the Wikipedian
<bobthewikipedian(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Re-read what I wrote. I didn't say
"best". Having never browsed around
specifically for porn, and Wikipedia having been the only site that's put
porn in my face without my asking for it, on top of the fact Wikipedia has
an excellent categorization system and is allowed even in the workplace and
schools, and is a globally-famous site, this qualifies my statement.
On 9/10/2012 2:19 PM, Nathan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Bob the
Wikipedian
<bobthewikipedian(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I can't imagine a site more accessible and
better organized than
Wikipedia
for someone seeking porn. They're quite correct.
Bob
Really? Wikipedia is the best porn site you can imagine? Welcome to
the
Internets, Bob, take a look around.
______________________________**_________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikien-l<https://lists.wi…
______________________________**_________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikien-l<https://lists.wi…