I don't believe a different license is needed. CC licenses can be used
for anonymous works: The author is not given and does not have to be
credited, but everything else (attribution of the work and share-alike)
would stay the same. So a change in the terms of use to the effect of,
"Unregistered edits are considered to have no named author," would be
sufficient.
Kyanos
On 03/27/2015 06:41 AM, WereSpielChequers wrote:
Perhaps we should move to a different licensing model
for future IP edits. CC0 for IP edits would be a more sensible license for edits by an IP
where in many cases no-one could attribute the edit to the individual who made it. If
people don't want to release their edits as CC0 they can always create an account.
Regards
Jonathan Cardy
> On 27 Mar 2015, at 10:28, Elias Friedman <elipongo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's actually required so as to provide attribution as per the Creative
> Commons and other licenses we operate under.
>
> Sent from my Droid 4
> Elias Friedman A.S., CCEMT-P
> אליהו מתתיהו בן צבי
> elipongo(a)gmail.com
> "יְהִי אוֹר"
>