Two advantages of our current system over juries are efficiency and
speed. This is particularly useful re blocking of vandals and speedy
deletion of attack pages - in both cases the first admin to pass by
will do the appropriate block or deletion. If you want a slower less
efficient system you don't just need to show that the much larger
number of jury members would be available, you also need to identify a
benefit for this proposal, and that benefit would need to be more than
commensurate with the disbenefits that I've identified.
WereSpielChequers
On 20 August 2010 18:13, Ian Woollard <ian.woollard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We don't absolutely need admins at all.
If we used randomly chosen juries to make decisions then we could use
bureaucrats or even bots to actually apply any decisions made.
That essentially avoids the 'who polices the police' issue.
--
-Ian Woollard