On 11/29/06, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/29/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG
<guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:54:05 -0500, "The Cunctator"
<cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If the source is a blog, the reader can supply
his
judgment in how much credence to give the source
But if the *only* sources are blogs we clearly have a problem.
Why?
Doesn't the "No Original Research" policy say that sources need to be
"reliable" sources? I think a blog would be fine, if the author was
generally acknowledged to be a reliable reporter on the subject
matter. Of course, under such a rule we might have to leave out
certain popular newspapers as sources considering their track record
of getting things wrong.
Anthony