It appears to me the parser functions are intended to be executed by
the client. I suggest instead interwiki transclusions, meaning all
content is built on the wikidata host. Specialized facilities & data
models implemented by the host are a black box to everyone else. If a
specialized infobox is wanted by a client, then the person needs to
develop it on the wikidata host, and request it by name in her
transclusion. The host could then offer a page-layout user interface,
appropriate for more advanced users than the typical.
On 30.05.2012
12:44, jmcclure(a)hypergrove.com wrote:
Not only are comments welcome
but, everyone is
invited to update the text however they see fit. Please
do not be argumentative - save that for its talk page. At a minimum, the
proposal suggests that wiki transclusion of content from the wikidata
repository is an interesting alternative to the display inclusion parser
functions. This approach keeps development of wikidata resources within
the wikidata community, which is perfectly appropriate.
On
30.05.2012 12:21, jmcclure(a)hypergrove.com wrote:
> I have updated
the page [1] I started containing requirements and design notes
for a
topicmap-based wikidata repository. Comments are welcomed and I'll
continue to rationalize the material I have to offer.
>
> Thanks,
> John McClure
> Belltower Wikis
>
> [1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikitopics [1]
Links:
------
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikitopics