Hi Lydia, all,
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Markus Krötzsch
<markus(a)semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
On 05.03.2016 14:45, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
Give it another 2 to 3 weeks and it'll get
there. More and more editors
are exposed to the separation in the UI now and start noticing the ones
that intuitively should be moved into the identifier section.
Ok, let's see what happens. I am not saying that the other criteria applied
now in the discussions are bad. It's just another use of the datatype than I
would have expected.
I'm one of the people who noticed the separation and indeed wondered
why some of the chemistry-related identifiers I tagged and added in
the long lists of identifiers were not included yet...
What is the exact process? Do you just plan to wait longer to see if
anyone supports/contradicts my tagging? Should I get other Wikidata
users and contributors to back up my suggestion?
Originally, I though the idea was just to remove/leave/add them in/to
the list, but people started making comments now. I will do this more
explicitly now. Also for the IDs I added.
Egon
--
E.L. Willighagen
Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
Maastricht University (
http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
Homepage:
http://egonw.github.com/
LinkedIn:
http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
Blog:
http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList:
http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286
ImpactStory:
https://impactstory.org/EgonWillighagen