Nope, I speak for myself. Nether told anything else.
I don't really appreciate the tone, I think reasonator is really cool
and I'm probably one of the people who pushed its use the most in Wikidata.
Do you have a useful answer to your own question ?
One point is that Reasonator uses Wikidata query, who, last time I
checked, was not planned to be integrated into Wikibase. Wikibase will have
its own query engine. It would be a giant software architecture mess if the
core mediawiki/wikibase depends on external query engine.
2014-12-30 13:48 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hoi,
One of the requisites as mentioned on the page by Lydia is that it is
usable on any and all projects. Relying on local only technoloy like
templates do not make sense.
Reasonator DOES provide functionality that is similar to what can be
achieved with templating. When a person has relatives, for instance it will
show. When something is in a particular location, it will show the
hierarchy. when there is a geo coordinate, it shows a map,
Now citing "political reasons" begs the question since when our
community decides NOT to implement things that are so manifestly in line
what our mission.
When you consider in build queries... That is what Reasonator offers
for a long long time.
Do you really know what Reasonator is about ? Do you speak for the
community ??
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 December 2014 at 13:30, Thomas Douillard <
thomas.douillard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Gerard, I like Reasonator a lot, but there is several advantages to
> an integrated solution :
> * We can reuse technologies of the mediawiki ecosystem, like for
> example a very important one : templates, that are already used an that a
> lot of wikimedians knows. It can be used to build template articles. I
> don't know if reasonator atm had a lot of contributions. It needs a github
> or something account and Javascript knowledge.
> * community is reluctant to use not in wiki tools for such needs, it's
> politically hard to push Reasonator integration into Wikidata fundamental
> templates, I can tell.
> * A solution based on prebuilt queries to select the appropriate
> template seems not so hard to implement only with Wikibase concepts, and
> deeply integrated to the mediawiki ecosystem, integrate Reasonator will
> probably eventually not result into such result.
>
> And yes, Reasonator is usable right now. So it's cool that this
> feature is not implemented right now :) And reasonator can follow its own
> path.
>
>
> 2014-12-30 12:28 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
> :
>
>> Hoi,
>> You also forget that it HAS been in use on several Wikipedias in the
>> past. So when that was no problem why is it a problem that can not be
>> overcome now and for now?
>> Thanks,
>> GerardM
>>
>> On 30 December 2014 at 12:15, Gerard Meijssen <
>> gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hoi,
>>> They are mostly excuses. The software has been in use for a LONG
>>> time. It is known for its relevance for the same long time.. So the value
>>> of this need is diminished by the lack of attention in the past.
>>>
>>> The point is that these excuses are very much in the way of us
>>> achieving our goal.. sharing in the sum of all knowledge. The knowledge in
>>> Wikidata is available knowledge to us so we do not have a valid excuse.
>>> Thanks,
>>> GerardM
>>>
>>> On 30 December 2014 at 11:38, Michał Łazowik <mlazowik(a)me.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> > Wiadomość napisana przez Gerard Meijssen <
>>>> gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> w dniu 30 gru 2014, o godz. 10:24:
>>>> >
>>>> > Reasonator works now.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but the thing is that putting anything on production is not
>>>> just including it there.
>>>> The whole code needs to be reviewed and there are some limitations,
>>>> especially
>>>> with 3rd party libraries. Bootstrap is a no-go. There are code
>>>> conventions, performance
>>>> and compatibility issues (mediawiki has to support IE 8) and
>>>> internationalisation. And
>>>> tests.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe some of these things are already there, but still the review
>>>> would have to be
>>>> done.
>>>>
>>>> Michał
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>>>> Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>> Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org