Detailed voting data available:
Votes:
22.whether to accept amendments
23.approve directive
Mārtiņš
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:05 PM Jan Gerlach <jgerlach(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
So close. More work to do towards national
implementation. We'll have a
statement out later today.
Thanks for your help, everyone!
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 4:59 AM Katherine Maher <kmaher(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> So narrow, that hurts.
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:56 Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <
> dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, that was the vote on whether to accept amendments.
>>
>> The Directive was approved 348-274.
>>
>> D
>>
>> На вт, 26.03.2019 г. в 12:53 ч. Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <
>> dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com> написа:
>>
>>> Directive approved
>>> by 5 votes
>>> 317 to 312
>>>
>>> На вт, 26.03.2019 г. в 10:09 ч. Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <
>>> dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com> написа:
>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> Today after 12:30 we expect the European Parliament in Strasbourg
>>>> to vote on the copyright file.
>>>>
>>>> First there will be a vote on whether to allow amendments or just
>>>> vote the entire package as is. Only if there is a majority for that will
>>>> votes on deleting Articles 11 and 13 be allowed. I am attaching a voting
>>>> list with recommendations on Article 13, so you can follow the vote.
>>>>
>>>> Stream is here:
>>>>
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/website/webstreaming.html?event=20190326-0900…
>>>>
>>>> What happens if the reform is passed as is:
>>>> The Council will nod this off at a General Council meeting on 9
>>>> April. Then it will be published in the official journal and Member
States
>>>> will have 24 months to transpose the new rules. In this case we will
work
>>>> on national implementations. There is a lot we can to remedy *some* of
the
>>>> effects of Article 13 & open the door to future litigation. We can
also
>>>> widen the gains some of the exceptions provide at least nationally.
>>>>
>>>> What happen is the European Parliament amends the reform:
>>>> The entire text goes to Council and then the Member States
>>>> governments need to decide if they accept it as is or want to further
amend
>>>> it and negotiate with the EP. In this case we focus on the EP elections,
as
>>>> a move before them would be unlikely.
>>>>
>>>> Very hypothetical:
>>>> If a country, such as Germany for instance, suddenly changes its
>>>> behaviour on 9 April, it could theoretically still stop the package. But
>>>> copyright is already agreed upon in Council and put down as an "A
item" for
>>>> the 9 April meeting. A items are considered purely procedural, get
nodded
>>>> off and not even discussed (as agreement and a vote have already taken
>>>> place). There is only one time, to my knowledge, that such an A item was
>>>> pulled back. The Software Patents Directive. I think it is extremely
>>>> unlikely to happen again.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks everyone for you help and support.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers from Strasbourg,
>>>> Dimi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>> Publicpolicy mailing list
>> Publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
>>
> --
>
> Katherine Maher (she/her)
>
> Executive Director
>
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Publicpolicy mailing list
> Publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
>
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org