Hi everyone,
I think an interesting first trial would be to select automatically
retrieve relevant OA bibliographies for each articles. As an experienced
wikipedian, I can testify that searching for references might be a
time-consuming activity, especially whenever I'm dealing with a topic I
don't know fully well. This kind of feature would allow to focus on the
actual writing.
Greetings,
PCL
Le 27/05/15 13:34, Lane Rasberry a écrit :
Hello,
Here are some options. We could talk more about any of them.
1. A bot which created new Wikipedia articles about certain well
reported clinical trials would probably be more feasible than
putting sentences into Wikipedia health articles.
2. If you actually want to put content into existing articles, there
probably is no way for your team learning how to do this without
someone close to you spending about 40 hours on Wikipedia learning
community practice. Wikipedia is the world's most consulted source
of health information and takes itself seriously in this space.
3. If you want the easiest path, make the bot exactly as you say, but
have it post to article talk pages so that a human volunteer can
preview the content and integrate it into the Wikipedia article
manually.
4. If you want to trial this, have the bot post information in a list
anyone on or off Wikipedia and let volunteers choose where to post
this. If you do this you would get feedback on what works and how
it works.
yours,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Edward Saperia
<ed(a)wikimanialondon.org <mailto:ed@wikimanialondon.org>> wrote:
Very interesting!
I've been working on a project that is related, but uses humans to
do summarising and inserting:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/OpenAccessReader
*Edward Saperia*
Conference Director Wikimania London <http://www.wikimanialondon.org/>
email <mailto:ed@wikimanialondon.org> • facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/edsaperia> • twitter
<http://www.twitter.com/edsaperia> • 07796955572
133-135 Bethnal Green Road, E2 7DG
On 27 May 2015 at 08:49, Saloni Agrawal <saloniagrawal(a)gmail.com
<mailto:saloniagrawal@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello everyone, my name is Saloni, and I’m a bioinformaticist.
I am interested in integrating scientific literature into
Wikipedia. I’m developing software that imports short 3 or
4-sentence summaries from open access articles into
appropriate sections of Wikipedia pages. The idea is for
readers to have access to open and recent published research
and to make Wikipedia a more comprehensive resource.
For example, this paper
(
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=10906501) describes
a clinical study carried out among Latin American women to
test a combined injectable contraceptive called Mesigyna. My
software is designed to summarize a few sentences from the
abstract (Creative Commons license for legal reasons) and
integrate it on this page “Combined injectable contraceptive”
(
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combined_injectable_contraceptive)
elaborating on Mesigyna in the Formulations sections.
Ideally, I would like to develop this into a bot so that users
don’t have to manually add information. I would really
appreciate any guidance and guidelines on implementing this
and how to get approval from the Wikipedia community.
I look forward to your thoughts and suggestions.
Best regards,
Saloni
_______________________________________________
OpenAccess mailing list
OpenAccess(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:OpenAccess@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/openaccess
_______________________________________________
OpenAccess mailing list
OpenAccess(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:OpenAccess@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/openaccess
--
Lane Rasberry
user:bluerasberry on Wikipedia
206.801.0814
lane(a)bluerasberry.com <mailto:lane@bluerasberry.com>
_______________________________________________
OpenAccess mailing list
OpenAccess(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/openaccess