Right now, I'm using the following working rewriting rules for my
SouthernApproachWiki (http://www.southernapproach.ch/wiki/), however,
they are sometimes slow and might contain errors. Google for example
hasn't indexed my wiki so far, most likely because of the rewriting
rules.
My wiki is located in http://www.southernapproach.ch/wiki/.
== .htaccess ==
RewriteEngine on
RewriteBase /
RewriteRule ^wiki$ /wiki/index.php [L]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/wiki$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/wiki/(images|skins)/
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/wiki/(redirect|texvc|index).php
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/error/(40(1|3|4)|500).html
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/favicon.ico
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/robots.txt
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /wiki/index.php?title=$1 [L,QSA]
== LocalSettings.php ==
$wgSitename = "SouthernApproachWiki";
$wgServer = "http://www.southernapproach.ch";
$wgScriptPath = "/wiki";
$wgScript = "$wgScriptPath/index.php";
$wgRedirectScript = "$wgScriptPath/redirect.php";
$wgArticlePath = "$wgScriptPath/$1";
Martin
I am sending you this mail as a pre-announcement, because many have
asked me:
currently I work on a patch of ENotif 2.00 (e-mail notification) for
MediaWiki 1.3.10. This will be basically a maintenance port of my older
ENotif patch published last October see http://meta.wikipedia.org/Enotif
. (This patch was for mw 1.3.7).
Remark: the most recent working version of ENotif is available in CVS
HEAD and also includes a working e-mail authentication method by mailing
a temporary password, which is valid only for one login.
My patch will come as a diff against MW 1.3.10 and as a fully
installable tgz of MW 1.3.10+ENotif, which can be used for installation
with existing or new databases, as the patch comes with a
database-upgrader (updating an existing wiki database if needed).
Scheduled time for release: 09. Feb. 2005
Wikinaut Tom
Hi,
I have a fragment of wikitext in an extension, and I'm desperately
trying to get it parsed.
My extension works perfectly, what I just don't know is :
__how to convert my wikitext to html__ ??
Can someone tell me how to do that. It must be the simplest thing but I
can't find the correct class and the correct method.
EXAMPLE:
*****************
$mytext= "=== MyTitle ===";
$mytext .= "some more text, with [[links]]";
$output = turn_That_To_Html($mytext); // <-- HERE IS MY PROBLEM
return output;
*****************
Thanks for any hint,
François
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:39:21 +0000, Jason Davies <ucgajpd(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> maybe you all know about this but a google search just now gave me this
> page
>
> http://www.mvsell.com/MV1/Project%20Files/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> wikipedia_glossary.html
Evil though this seemed on first sight, I think there may be a
[fairly] innocent explanation. That site *does* carry a mirror of
Wikipedia content, but not at that location - click "Encyclopedia" at
the bottom; ok, so it's on a different domain, but maybe they just
reorganised and didn't bother with redirects, so something's out of
date somewhere? (Note also that *anything* after the /MV1/ will bring
up that same page)
What were you searching *for* when you turned this up? Asking Google
link:www.mvsell.com/MV1/Project%20Files/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/wikipedia_glo…
turned up nothing linking to such an address, so I don't quite
understand why Google would think it existed.
--
Rowan Collins BSc
[IMSoP]
Hi all,
So, is xhtml_slim.pt gone in 1.4beta6? I wanted to add the sourceforge
and donation logos to the quickbar and was pointed to that file, which I
can't actually find in the source. I've added the logos directly to
MonoBook.php on line 180 before the last </div>, and that seems to work,
but is that the correct way? (looks like there's a note on the Look and
Feel wiki page about it). Should I do that with the rest of the skin
files and call it safe, or is there a more appropriate way?
Cheers,
-John
--
JW Pennington | My Mind Map:http://oregonstate.edu/~penningj/
Masters Student: Bioresource Engineering & Geosciences
Oregon State Univ., Wilkinson 017, Corvallis Or. 97331
"A computer without windows is like a dog
without bricks tied to its head."
Rowan Collins wrote:
>I must say I'm not sure where "wmfilter" came from - did you mean
>"mwfilter", as in "MediaWiki filter"? (I expect you know this, but
>note http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Names - "wm" makes me think
>"Wikimedia", which is something completely different; but that's
>probably coincidence to why you called it that...)
I'm aware of the difference between Mediawiki and Wikimedia. (In
fact, I'm the person who coined the term "Wikimedia.") I didn't come
up with the current name for wmfilter. The name was originated by
Aldon Hynes, who wrote the first version of it.
>I may be being a bit conservative about this, but "interwiki" is kind
>of a standard term in the wikiworld, and has stuck despite very early
>on being co-opted for more general linkage. More to the point, it
>seems a rather strange compromise to rewrite part of MediaWiki so that
>you can rename an external tool to something that matches a new
>internal name.
I don't know if it's "strange" or not. The point is to arrive at a
common naming convention.
>I note, however, that you say Drupal encourages tables to be
>*prefixed* appropriately - are you aware that recent versions of
>MediaWiki have the ability to prefix all table names in an install, to
>allow them to co-exist on the same mysql server with other projects?
>If you really really want your module to be named to tie in with
>MediaWiki, why not call it "mediawiki"; that way, the interwiki table
>could be called "mediawiki.interwiki", and everyone's happy, and
>you've even used the prefixing concept as it was probably intended.
Drupal has the same prefixing ability, so that a single database can
be used to serve multiple Drupal installations. Your solution
therefore doesn't really work. Naming the filter "mediawiki" would
imply that the module puts an entire mediawiki installation inside
Drupal -- which is something I wouldn't mind seeing but is beyond the
limited scope of this particular module.
I see your point, though, about "interwiki" having the status of a
standard term in the wikiworld. There's even an article about the
term on Wikipedia. (Go figure.) Here's the URL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interwiki
However, it appears that the conventional name for the table used by
the database is "intermap," not "interwiki."
Is there general agreement here that "interwiki" is the name to go
with? If so, that's what I'll use for the Drupal module.
Regards,
Sheldon Rampton
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:10:07 +0000, Jason Davies <ucgajpd(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> does anyone have a good suggestion for how to get started with using
> dates, as the wikipedia does? does this involve extra installation of
> any kind? thanks.
I think you need to be more specific as to what you mean here. There
are all sorts of things to do with dates that Wikipedia does, from
putting them into different formats by user preference (a software
feature) to having things, such as the Front Page, change day by day
(a clever use of templates and magic variables like {{CURRENTDAY}}) to
having an article on each date with various things related to that.
I suspect the last one is what you may be referring to, simply because
your subject line says "...and calendar". Each date page on Wikipedia
has a calendar displayed on it, made it seems out of an extremely
complex system of nested templates - [[Template:JanuaryCalendar]],
[[Template:JanuaryCalendar2005]],
[[Template:JanuaryCalendar2005Source]],
[[Template:31DayCalendarStartingOnSaturday]], etc, etc. No special
software feature here, certainly no extra installation, just one hell
of a lot of setting up templates to do whatever people have made those
calendars capable of doing. I have literally no idea why they are so
complicated, and couldn't immediately find anywhere explaining how
they work; but presumably *someone* knows - maybe User:ABCD, who seems
to have created some of them, could tell you...
--
Rowan Collins BSc
[IMSoP]
does anyone have a good suggestion for how to get started with using
dates, as the wikipedia does? does this involve extra installation of
any kind? thanks.
maybe you all know about this but a google search just now gave me this
page
http://www.mvsell.com/MV1/Project%20Files/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
wikipedia_glossary.html
where the seller has allowed google to fnd the wikipedia entry and take
me to a selling site - it didn't even give me the wikipedia content...
they really take the piss, don't they?!