Mostly, it has to do with the action date. I don't think it makes WMF or LangCom look
very good to have dozens of projects that appear to have been pending for over five years,
especially when the requester is someone who showed up for a day, or a couple of weeks,
and then has disappeared. I think it's much better to make sure the requests that are
pending are current ones.
My intention, once I get to requests that are no more than a couple of years old, is to
allow projects to remain "on hold" for 1–2 years, and only after that closing
them. I'm figuring that if no one shows up in two years, we ought to move on.
Finally, I do intend to make clear on such pages that a future request would be welcomed
if a community (re-)appears in the future.
Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
________________________________
From: Langcom <langcom-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of
langcom-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org <langcom-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 11:27 AM
To: langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Langcom Digest, Vol 52, Issue 16
Send Langcom mailing list submissions to
langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.wik…
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
langcom-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
langcom-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Langcom digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Four more Wikipedia requests dating to the summer of 2010
(Steven White)
2. Final group of projects with requests lingering since 2010
(Steven White)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:37:24 +0000
From: Steven White <koala19890(a)hotmail.com>
To: "langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org" <langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Langcom] Four more Wikipedia requests dating to the
summer of 2010
Message-ID:
<MWHPR12MB1805E502A0C40BD12713CF439EEC0(a)MWHPR12MB1805.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Having heard no comments on the proposals with respect to Egyptian and Homshetsma over the
last seven days, I will close both as rejected, as described in my original message.
Sent from
Outlook<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2…
________________________________
From: Langcom <langcom-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of
langcom-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org <langcom-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 7:00 AM
To: langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Langcom Digest, Vol 52, Issue 14
Send Langcom mailing list submissions to
langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.wik…
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
langcom-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
langcom-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Langcom digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Montenegrin project (Steven White)
2. Four more Wikipedia requests dating to the summer of 2010
(Steven White)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 15:35:23 +0000
From: Steven White <Koala19890(a)hotmail.com>
To: "langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org" <langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Langcom] Montenegrin project
Message-ID:
<CY4PR12MB18000D6A5BA7FB790B277F779EEB0(a)CY4PR12MB1800.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Amir: Someone has written a response to your email to LangCom at the bottom of the
discussion page on Meta.
Gerard: You don't get asked all that often here to spend a lot of time on an involved,
complicated decision. If I thought I could easily digest it and feed it to you I would.
But I don't. I'm not asking you for a lot of time; rather, the community you serve
needs you to spend the appropriate amount of time to see the latest evidence and decide
what you think.
Sent from
Outlook<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2…