Thanks, MF, for bringing this to our attention! I agree that a) it is eligible (valid ISO 639-3 code); b) it fulfills the requirements for approval; c) we now need an expert for verification. (Sorry, I don't know anyone.) Regards, Oliver On 26-Feb-16 3:11 AM, MF-Warburg wrote: Hi all, I would like to propose the approval of Livvi-Karelian Wikipedia (Meta request: [1]). The test-project is active with several (at least 7!) different active users since Aug/Sept 2015 ([2]) and the most-used messages are complete ([3]). As the request has not been marked as eligible yet, is there anything which speaks against the eligibility of this language? If not, does anyone know an expert who can verify the content of the test-project? Best regards, MF-W [1] < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Livvi-… [2] < https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/olo… [3] <http://tools.wmflabs.org/robin/?tool=codelookup&code=olo> _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing listLangcom@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom