Hi all,
we have 4 closure proposals for which I would like to propose decisions:
# 1
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_A…
The proposer says: *"This wiki only has 5
pages<https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/am:Special:Allpages>in the
mainspace:
*
1. *A redirect*
2. *The Main Page*
3. *A page with just a link in it (supposed to be a redirect or list?)*
4. *A quote from Martin Luther King Jr.*
5. *A list (I don't know what this means, but I'll assume it's content)"*
This clearly fulfilles the criterion of "Absence of content since the
wiki's creation", in my opinion. Additionally the request has been open
since November 2012. Most commentator support a closure, with the notable
exception of one Amharic user who misunderstood the proposal as "removing
the possibility of Amharic Wikiquote" and argued that the project would
need more time. He has however also not become active.
Therefore, I propose MOVE TO INCUBATOR.
# 2
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_U…
This is a clear case of absence of content (<
https://uz.wikibooks.org/wiki/Maxsus:AllPages>, many pages only contain one
link or image or so) and total inactivity. Therefore, MOVE TO INCUBATOR.
# 3
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_N…
This was proposed in the wake of a very long discussion about the
usefulness of Wikinews here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Proposals_for_closing_projects/Archive…
Some people searched for an inactive Wikinews to propose it for closure,
with the argumentation that Wikinews needs to have a certain activity
standard to be useful (*Even if "no activity is cited not as a reason to
close a project - a dead wikinews project happens to be a different reason.
As stated by many users for many times, wikinews has a unique problem among
wikimedia-projects. The content in the wiki gets less valuable the more
time has passed. Wikinews does not produce the kind of quality which passes
the test of time). *In response, some supporters of Wikinews started
translating some articles from the English Wikinews to Norwegian. Jon
Harald said they were bad machine translations - maybe you can clarify?
I do however not know to what extent these translations still go on today.
It seems like the last recent activity was on June 10 (<
https://no.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Spesial:Siste_endringer&days=30&f…>).
While this is not exactly brilliant, the project certainly has no absence
of content, and from past experience of moving the even larger inactive
Wikinewses in Dutch and Hungarian back to Incubator, I have seen that
1) the import process will be long and annoying
2) activity restart is of course much more likely, and better visible on
the own subdomain.
Therefore, I propose to KEEP.
# 4
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_X…
Closure was proposed for inactivity; apart for the fact that the proposer
unfortunately did not reply to any further inquiries (such as whether he
thought content should be moved to Incubator, etc. - he seems to have
thought of a deletion initally?), we all know that "inactivity alone is no
valid reason for closure". The project can also not be called of having
absence of content.
What is more, there is some recent activity
https://xh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges (maybe also sparked by
the closure proposal). So, I propose to KEEP.
Best regards,
MF-Warburg
I see no problems here either. Obviously however interwiki links wouldn't
work when the wiki doesn't exist yet (see also <
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/Items_for_Wikim…
>).
2013/5/28 Jon Harald Søby <jhsoby(a)gmail.com>
> I don't see any reason why WD shouldn't allow all languages, and have
> often wondered why it doesn't already. So I would heartily support a
> recommendation like this.
>
>
> 2013/5/27 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
>
>> Hoi,
>> At the hackathon in Amsterdam I discussed the use of Wikidata for any and
>> all languages.
>>
>> I am of the opinion that Wikidata is not only a tool serving Wikipedias
>> but it can be and will be so much more. It is for this reason that I
>> propose that the language committee allows the use of any language in
>> Wikidata that has an ISO-639-3 code.
>>
>> This is explicitly including any and all artificial language and dead
>> languages. I expect that one of the next phases of Wikidata will be using
>> it for lexicon related functionalities including searching for pictures in
>> Commons.
>>
>> I hope you can agree with this and when we do, we can recommend this to
>> the Wikimedia board.
>> Thanks,
>> Gerard
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom-l mailing list
>> Langcom-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> mvh
> Jon Harald Søby <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom-l mailing list
> Langcom-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l
>
>
https://translatewiki.net/wiki/Thread:Support/Request_for_enabling_new_vari…
>> Currently Wikipedia in Hakka language are written in roman script
(Mainly used by Hakka people in Taiwan). However, for Hakka people who stay
in China，South East Asia and others country, they faced difficulties in
understanding the Hakka roman script. Hence, we request for enabling 2 new
variants which are Traditional Hakka Script (which used by Hakka people in
Hong Kong or Older Hakka people）and Simplified Hakka Script（used by Hakka
people in China or others country). Thank you. Below are the information of
variants: <<