Op 18 jan. 2016, om 14:28 heeft Lizzy Jongma
<L.Jongma(a)rijksmuseum.nl>
het volgende geschreven:
Dear all,
I noticed that Baglama 2 mentioned a new service: an API. I am under
the impression that the API is going to replace the current service.
Does anyone know wether this is true? I tried to work with the API
but I am not a JSON expert and so far got no understandable dataâ¦.
Best wishes
Lizzy Jongma, Rijksmuseum
On 18 Jan 2016, at 14:21, Hans Muller
<j.m.muller(a)hccnet.nl> wrote:
Dear all,
Magnus' tool BaGLAMa 2 (detailed Pageview analysis) is extremely
valuable to track interest for GLAM donations, and to convince GLAMs
how useful their donation is or could be.
One question remains:
* Is the bounce (click and immediately/quickly gone) component
included/excluded in the number of pageviews?
I always thought that bounce was included because it is much harder
to exclude it, so i used the numbers with a caveat and only
relatively to each other, but then perhaps the tool tacitly assumes
that a pageview only counts when the dwell time exceeds say ...??
sec?
With Google analytics on other websites one finds that the bounce
component routinely is of the order of 30%, so perhaps for wikimedia
sites the same amount holds.
Perhaps someone knows, thanks and best regards,
User:Hansmuller
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hansmuller
PS Example:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/glamtools/baglama2/#gid=205&month=201512
with many pageviews thanks to the often-clicked article Mumbai
_______________________________________________
Glamtools mailing list
Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
_______________________________________________
Glamtools mailing list
Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools