OK, I am not sure I understand the issue correctly, so I'll just throw out
some notes:
* I do not count the pageviews. They are counted by the Wikimedia
Foundation, I just use them as-is.
* The official definition of page views seems to be at
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/Pageviews
* AFAIK, the data before 2015-12 used only desktop views; the new one uses
also mobile, but removes "views" by bots and crawlers.
* Not sure what the "bounce" feature is; the preview thing in the mobile
app? Or the MediaViewer? (I believe page views count neither of those)
Finally, a "view" in the baglama2 tool means an image was included on a
page that a human loaded in his/her browser. I have no data if that image
was actually on the screen ("below the fold", no scrolling), but since
"important" images in an article tend to be near the top, I just count the
page view.
Hope that helps,
Magnus
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:19 PM Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hans Muller, 18/01/2016 14:52:
As far as i can see, the API does not answer the
bounce question.
The API talks of pageviews
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/pageviews_API ; your question is
IMHO the wrong one, i.e. "how can we estimate how many pageviews are
real?". The real question is "how many times are the files actually
seen?".
To answer the real question, you have to use mediacounts instead:
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/Data/Mediacounts
You can see an example at
http://wiki.wikimedia.it/wiki/File:2015-10-beic-counts.ods
The results are very similar to what baglama yields, for this specific
case (BEIC media).
Nemo
_______________________________________________
Glamtools mailing list
Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools