Yes we do need to release 2.0. There are a few major differences between version 1.2 and 2.0. * Some of the line spacing is a little bit taller. * There's a different method to call tabs * The new method to call tabs requires HTML that is not allowed in wiki markup. I did finally figure out the best use of the obcache to change the content of the page to allow the mark up if you switch the feature on. v2.0 would definitely not be backwards compatible with v1.2 in wiki markup if someone is using tabs. Any pages that use tabs would definitely have to change their mark up and actually the way they display is a little different too. v2.0 is actually downloaded from the development branch with version 1.2 on the master branch. All that needs to be done would be create a v1.2 branch for patches (if desired), make the final fixes for obcache and then merge development into master and release. Tom _______________________________________________ Foreground mailing list Foreground(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foreground

Hi Mark Sounds like a great idea but the changes wouldn't have a method to check for tabs. Anyone could use tabs anywhere on any page without limitations. Foundation 4 used <section> tags with classes to build the tabs.[0] Foundation 5 (v2.0's build) uses a combination of <ul>, <li> and <a href=""> to make tabs. [1] <ul> and <li> aren't an issue. It is the <a> tags which are sanitized. For v2.0, when the tabs feature is enabled the sanitizer used to strip out <a> tags is reversed and the output makes the <a> tag active again. Because of the change an admin would have to go to any page they are using tabs on and update the wiki markup to use <ul>, <li> and <a> tags. Disappointed in the way Zurb changed this from 4. At least they did keep the same code valid from Foundation 5 to Foundation 6. Unfortunately, this doesn't help us. Tom [0] http://foundation.zurb.com/sites/docs/v/4.3.2/components/section.html [1] http://foundation.zurb.com/sites/docs/v/5.5.3/components/tabs.html -----Original Message----- From: Foreground [mailto:foreground-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Mark A. Hershberger Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 11:05 AM To: Discussion about the Mediawiki skin Foreground (https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Skin:Foreground) &lt;foreground(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; Subject: Re: [Foreground] Foreground 2.0.0? I've been watching how upgrades are handled in the MediaWiki world for a few years and I think we can all do better than we have been. While going to 2.0 is a big help, could we put in a hook and ask people upgrading to run update.php? In the hook, we could check for the use of tabs and make sure that it is compatible with Foreground 2.0. Alternatively, we could set check to see (via a flag in the DB?) if this is the first time the 2.0 version has been run and show a notice (to admins only?) of changes that need to be made. I haven't yet looked at the differences, so I'm not sure how feasible this is, but it would help I'm not tied to any of these ideas, of course. I just want to make the use of the software better for the end user. Thanks, Mark. Mark A. Hershberger NicheWork LLC 717-271-1084 _______________________________________________ Foreground mailing list Foreground(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foreground

Lol, but I know it's not funny! There are some changes in the navbar and the styling of it. There must be code changes to CSS if someone wants to maintain the same look. The drop-down menu heights are taller and the selectors for colors are a little different. It's had me thinking the past couple of days if we should release a completely new skin called ForegroundV2. This way someone could install it turn it on and see the differences. It would be a bit of a pain trying to maintain two versions so I hope just good documentation can solve this. There are definitely some great benefits to Foundation 5. Medium screen class, native on hover of page actions, data-options of elements, etc. Thanks for all your help too!!! Tom _______________________________________________ Foreground mailing list Foreground(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foreground

Yes, 2.x.x they should expect a break. I've worked out the new CSS for top-bar. I just have to go back through and double check a few things. Possibly 3.0. Once we merge 2.0 into mater and release branch it. I will investigate Foundation 6 more. Has anyone tested the current develop branch? It's almost ready for release.