On 10 July 2014 16:28, Pau Cabot <paucabot(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Jennifer,
First, COI <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest> is
related to editing Wikipedia in your own interests or in the interests of
your external relationships. It does not forbid obviously writing about the
things you're an expert on. If you are able to separate these two things,
you're allowed to do it.
Correct, but the point is still a subtle one in practice. Clearly the
"separation" is easiest for those who have a very clear idea of
Wikipedia's
mission, and plenty of experience of the type of writing Wikipedia aims to
include (and how people react to the other kinds).
The guideline is meant, as such things generally are, to convey to editors
what the expectations the site has of them.
In talking to academics, I tend to say that Wikipedia articles are meant to
be "good surveys", and lead the discussion onto the ground of how surveys
could fail to be good (tacitly, "or even to be a survey"). I'm sure the
points about self-citation and skewing the content excessively to a single
school of thought are comprehensible in that context.
The distinction between what you are permitted to do, and what it is
advisable to do, remains. Most ordinary folk have no real means of knowing
what they may be getting into when they edit Wikipedia, and stray
marginally in the direction of self-promotion.
Charles