On Billinghurst's point I would really love to see the changes that
have been successful tested on (particularly) Wikisource, where I
imagine that the dropdown metadata could be tremendously valuable.
On 25 January 2016 at 07:42, Oliver Keyes <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I really like this idea but I'd recommend we use
it for more
qualitative than quantitative feedback, unless we have a solid plan to
surface the labs page to a good sample of users.
On 23 January 2016 at 00:07, Dan Garry <dgarry(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On 22 January 2016 at 20:43, Julien Girault
<jgirault(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Thank you for jumping on this, though the aim of this thread was to have a
discussion and move forward (with this kind of technical operations) only
once we get a common feeling that this is a good idea and we figured out the
concerns that people may have.
Nonetheless, I'm sure removing this is just as easy as setting it up, so I
don't see any harm for now.
Yeah, these things can be pulled down and replaced with something else with
just a few console commands, so I don't think there's any problems here
either. :-)
Dan
--
Dan Garry
Lead Product Manager, Discovery
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
discovery mailing list
discovery(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery
--
Oliver Keyes
Count Logula
Wikimedia Foundation